Boot talking about dogmatism prevailing in today's world where it is difficult approach to what was, wrong, it is obvious and the fact that general.
As long as the privileged relationship between the United States and "Israel" continues, with the meaning of this relationship is the continued flow of money, loans and grants, and the weapons and continue to support the U.S. diplomat to Israel, the concepts and provisions dogmatism will continue to distort facts and obscured. In doing so, will understand that "Israel was" the victim and it was not the neighboring countries, and that it is attacked in the wars of the 48,56,67 and 73, and that the reprisals carried out by the very justified, as it comes in the context of the response to terrorism, violence and self-defense .
Notes and will therefore remain outside of Moshe Sharett, the official history of the events, because it is the source of documentary sheds light shining on the fact the events and facts as they are.
It remains to be Charette and disagreed with the current masters of the extreme then the likes of Ben-Gurion and Dayan in terms of approach and style, but the goals and the results were one and this is what we can see from the follow-up notes Charette.
The first chapter (Moshe Sharett and his own memoirs)
About the life of Moshe Sharett: born in Russia in 1894, and moved to Palestine in 1906 with his family. Joined the ranks of the Ottoman army officer during World War I, and then joined the Zionist movement worldwide, as was a founding member of the Zionist Mapai party. Was in permanent conflict with Ben-Gurion to take over the leadership of the Zionist movement, accusing the latter make a connection with Prince Faisal through the U.S. mediator and also an attempt to delay the State of "Israel."
Look at Charette notes: It covers the period between 1953 and 1956 (term Charette), located in eight volumes consisting of 2400 pages, including personal events, family and political, national and international, are of high credibility, and for this reason, the son of Charette has been under enormous pressure to prevent their publication as they are.
Chapter II (Ben-Gurion, go to "ascend Poker" (settlement): Withdrawal moral tactic)
Ben-Gurion that the withdrawal of the political front in the "Israel" was an act of deliberate and planned. In that period, the Jewish state under a group of international political pressure by the attacks and military invasions, which was carried out by scattered settlers and the Zionist gangs indirectly supported by the Israeli army.
Charette was chosen carefully and accurately by his bitter political rival Ben-Gurion and his movement, to continue the same policy of aggression from the commission of the massacres and acts of expulsion and terror, but under the umbrella of a political moderate and acceptable.
Chapter III: Revenge of reply, as a prelude to war
In the October 11, 1953 raised "Ben-Zvi," Head of State of "Israel" then is an important issue, namely, "Is not there an opportunity to occupy Sinai, preferably the Egyptians began to any hostile action can be thwarted, and thus the invasion of the desert. Weah disappointment when I told him that the Egyptians do not show any tendency towards facilitating the occupation ... ". A part of this important chapter talks about the search for any pretext of the Zionists, paves the way for the occupation of Sinai. As the command is not available, Diane suggested sending a ship flying the Israeli flag in the Straits of Eilat to lure the Egyptians for the hit and then complete the scenario.
In the meantime, is the massacre of Qibya that have claimed dozens of Palestinian civilians at the hands of the Zionists, who find themselves particularly Charette in trouble are justified and explained what happened in front of international public opinion the compressor. Massacre shows a lack of satisfaction Charette entirely for this work carried out by militant groups and supporting the current Ben-Gurion - Dayan, showing disregard for the horrors that took place ...
Chapter IV: a historic opportunity to occupy southern Syria
In one meeting which was held on January 31, 1954 Dayan proposed a plan of action to provoke the Syrians and to draw the Israelis to hit the fishermen in Lake Tiberias. If the command fails, work to take the Iraqi intervention in Syria troubled time as a pretext to interfere in Syria and the occupation of the south.
Both Ben Gurion and Dayan, Lafon supported the proposed plans, but strongly opposed by Charette. And agrees that the Senator following is looming on the horizon when battling each Shishakli Adib Hashim Atassi, and the conflict resolved in favor of the second. In this context, promoted by the Jewish state news reports that Iraqi forces had entered the line of conflict in Syria, which was denied by the press and the international media and confirmed by the facts, and this was a Tvueta for the opportunity to wait it out was hard-line trend and active in the Zionist entity.
Continued Israeli provocations, as a prelude to lure the Syrians but without avail.
On December 12, 1954, abduction of the Israeli Air Force plane Syrian civilian passengers and detained for 48 hours has formed the controversial article with Charette, who accused his opponents of wanting to impose the law of the jungle to international relations and bring the world to their will and interests. The pretext for the Israeli hijacking operation is its violation of Syrian sovereignty of Israel, which was denied by Charette.
The day before, and only one, gave the Syrians arrested an Israeli spy ring consisting of five people were put to wiretap the telephone networks of Syria. In prison, one of the oldest members of the cell to commit suicide, which exacerbated the debate between hard-line trend and Sharett, who was considered an important task of this cell outrageous.
Chapter V: Let's Nncye Maronite State in Lebanon
This chapter tells some of what took place in the meeting held on February 27, 1954 to include all of Ben-Gurion, Sharett, Lavon and Dayan on the Lebanese issue. Trend opposition to Charette suggested a project to establish a Maronite State in Lebanon by creating unrest among ethnic groups, and impossible to make efforts to secure funding from the Jewish Agency if it is not from the Ministry of Finance. Sharett opposed the project, but not on the noble but on the basis that it is not possible does not serve the goals of the State of "Israel".
Project Ben-Gurion and his followers included the following points: Lebanon is the weakest of the Arab League countries, are historically the majority of the Maronites in Lebanon, support for the Christian world, both Catholic and Protestant brethren in Lebanon. Means: the creation of a civil war, the infusion of funds where necessary, find a Maronite secure this project.
Charette opposed because: Maronites are not the majority, there is a Maronite, saying believing in this project, at least at the time, that the adoption of the project is on the money and not on faith (a Maronite secure the project) that carries the seeds of failure, said the declaration would lead to a Maronite the integration of Muslims with a very vast lands of Syria, and thus becomes the Maronite surrounded by an Islamic state is huge. There is no guarantee material and moral enough internationally and regionally.
As is known, the draft Ben-Gurion and his followers, which is destined to be achieved to some extent. On February 12, 1955 meeting between Eliyahu Sasson, the Israeli ambassador in Rome and Najib small, representing apparently Camille Chamoun, the conditions for implementation were discussed.
In practice, the project began after the war of the 67 upon the arrival of Diane to the Defense Ministry when he took the search for a Maronite officer is ready to proclaim a state-saving and on the pretext of Maronites (commando operations launched from Lebanon) ....
Chapter VI: Sacred Terror
Outline of this chapter is the relentless Israeli attempts to create the atmosphere and the ground to wage war on the Arab countries in the mid-fifties, which saw a rapprochement between Arab countries and the West generally. In preparation for this war, the work of the Israeli army and the Zionist gangs to commit numerous massacres and acts of violence in order to drag Arab states, which has worked to take all precautions and security measures to thwart attempts by the Jewish state, to reply, and counter-retaliation and up to the war.
In chapter details and backgrounds to commit two slaughters: The first: the attack on a bus on 17 March 1954 on the road between Eilat and Beer, where a young man claimed the lives of ten passengers from the Zionists. "Israel" accused the Bedouins of Jordan, which in turn denied this and accused the "Israel" Pavtaalha excuse. The final investigation and all parties failed to reach conclusive results, but they all pointed out that the likelihood is that which is carried out by Zionist elements but not Arab. The massacre showed how most of the Zionist officials except Charette tried to use as a pretext to launch large-scale attack on Jordan and the occupation of the West Bank. But the response of the Israelis reflect a fierce attack on the village "Nahalin" near Bethlehem, killing and wounding dozens of Palestinians and also the demolition of dozens of homes.
The second massacre committed in the month of March 1955 when they killed a group of Israeli reserve army, later identified as linked to Ariel Sharon, five Bedouin Jordanians. Group had been arrested by the Israeli army admitted doing so. But the scenario orchestrated by all military and political officials only Charette and his group for their release, which occurred after a brief period of arrest and confession. Chapter shows how most segments of Israeli society and Israeli public opinion has supported this group did not feel the absolute minimum of regret, which surprised Charette horror of what happened at the moral, emotional, legal and political ...
Chapter Seven: the Lavon Affair: Terrorism in order to force the West
"First: Start immediate action to prevent or postpone the objectives of the Agreement Anglo - Egyptian, which is to: a. - Cultural centers and media, b - economic institutions, c - Cars and other delegates from the British, d - the destruction of any target can lead to the abuse of diplomatic relations.
Second: Let us know on what can be done on the Canal Zone (Suez).
Third: Listen to us every day at the seventh long wave c ".
This is the content text of the message sent to an Israeli spy ring in Egypt planted several months before its implementation, which occurred between 2 and July 27, 1954, and this telegram summarizing the general thrust of this chapter.
Relations were on their way to development and improvement, between Egypt and Britain (for the evacuation of the Suez Canal) and the United States, which promised to provide military supplies. The aim is to strike at Israel this rapprochement between Egypt and the Arab world, was the terrorist operations carried out against the cultural centers and American media, and against the role of British cinema and buildings Egyptian official in Cairo and Alexandria.
This issue is known as the Lavon Affair, who was defense minister at the time. It shows only after seven years of investigations, Israeli is not the fault of Avon, but this plot sewn by groups of Ben-Gurion and Dayan, Peres and Javeley and a number of other senior security and military Zionists. Charette was surprised at what happened because he did not know about all this and even condemned it, but in secret and not in public because he feared public opposition in the event that the accused by hardliners as defeatist and not on the degree of responsibility and leadership history.
Chapter VIII: Nasser: Coexistence with Israel is possible
Ben-Gurion: the process of the Gaza Strip.
Gamal Abdel Nasser did not hostile to Israel that shows the image in the Arab media. By Nasser has more than once derailed Altswoi and compromise, such as the words for "Roger Baldwin" Envoy of U.S. human rights organization as "not of those who want to throw the" Israel "in the Mediterranean." He believes in coexistence with "Israel" and that negotiations will begin in one day.
After finding that the terrorist operations carried out in Cairo and Alexandria, Nasser did not alter the analysis by U.S. intelligence, its position on the possibility of agreements with the Government of Charette.
The United States has put double pressure on both Nasser and Sharett in order to start negotiations leading to the kind of agreements.
Charette Government for its part, was under growing pressure from hard-line trend, which was aimed to further tension and escalation to the point of making a massive retaliatory action in the Gaza Strip in response to alleged terrorist acts against the settlers here and there in occupied Palestine, which was often fabricated by Zionists with a view to a wider war first and with a view to strained relations between the Arabs and the West II.
Thus, it was Ben-Gurion's group carried out a military operation in the Gaza Strip, killing 39 and wounding 30 Egyptians. Charette and agreed to the operation, but if it does not have a broad meaning they do not lead to more than a dozen victims. Although this process, and during a conversation between chiefs of staff Egyptian and Israeli Almndoyen under the banner of the Mixed Armistice Commission, said the first second that Nasser had told him that he had personal contacts with Israeli Prime Minister, and there are several good things can tend in a positive direction ...
Chapter IX: dispersal of Palestinian refugees
One of the major factors to exacerbate the situation by "Israel" is the distance and the dispersion of the Palestinians who left the territory of the 48 areas where they sought refuge along the lines of the truce in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.
That their presence there is always that they left their homeland by force, which will lead to international pressure to eventually return to their homes. The aim was also expelled again from there and bring them into the Arab countries Alakharyz
In this particular case, the similarity of the position of Charette with the position of the current hard-line ...
Chapter X: overthrow Nasser
At that time, the work of mainstream Zionist hardline regime was ousted Nasser for two reasons: the first personal Nasser leadership gathered and brought most Arab states and part of third world countries under his command against "Israel" with the means of pressure on the various levels of political, economic, military and media ...
II: convergence between Nasser and the West in general, and between America and Britain in particular, which means the exception, "Israel" and to be away from the center of attention and support of the Western world.
To this end, the campaign launched a two-way, I took the external portrays Nasser as too weak to establish a relationship of alliance and cooperation stable and consistent with the West because the state is weak and powerless and suffer from so many problems ...
II Ext: Egypt portrayed as a powerful and great and it's the most important in the Arab world, so it is always an existential danger. It must be hit before it growing more Vistvhal ordered and become immune to deterrence ...
As long as the privileged relationship between the United States and "Israel" continues, with the meaning of this relationship is the continued flow of money, loans and grants, and the weapons and continue to support the U.S. diplomat to Israel, the concepts and provisions dogmatism will continue to distort facts and obscured. In doing so, will understand that "Israel was" the victim and it was not the neighboring countries, and that it is attacked in the wars of the 48,56,67 and 73, and that the reprisals carried out by the very justified, as it comes in the context of the response to terrorism, violence and self-defense .
Notes and will therefore remain outside of Moshe Sharett, the official history of the events, because it is the source of documentary sheds light shining on the fact the events and facts as they are.
It remains to be Charette and disagreed with the current masters of the extreme then the likes of Ben-Gurion and Dayan in terms of approach and style, but the goals and the results were one and this is what we can see from the follow-up notes Charette.
The first chapter (Moshe Sharett and his own memoirs)
About the life of Moshe Sharett: born in Russia in 1894, and moved to Palestine in 1906 with his family. Joined the ranks of the Ottoman army officer during World War I, and then joined the Zionist movement worldwide, as was a founding member of the Zionist Mapai party. Was in permanent conflict with Ben-Gurion to take over the leadership of the Zionist movement, accusing the latter make a connection with Prince Faisal through the U.S. mediator and also an attempt to delay the State of "Israel."
Look at Charette notes: It covers the period between 1953 and 1956 (term Charette), located in eight volumes consisting of 2400 pages, including personal events, family and political, national and international, are of high credibility, and for this reason, the son of Charette has been under enormous pressure to prevent their publication as they are.
Chapter II (Ben-Gurion, go to "ascend Poker" (settlement): Withdrawal moral tactic)
Ben-Gurion that the withdrawal of the political front in the "Israel" was an act of deliberate and planned. In that period, the Jewish state under a group of international political pressure by the attacks and military invasions, which was carried out by scattered settlers and the Zionist gangs indirectly supported by the Israeli army.
Charette was chosen carefully and accurately by his bitter political rival Ben-Gurion and his movement, to continue the same policy of aggression from the commission of the massacres and acts of expulsion and terror, but under the umbrella of a political moderate and acceptable.
Chapter III: Revenge of reply, as a prelude to war
In the October 11, 1953 raised "Ben-Zvi," Head of State of "Israel" then is an important issue, namely, "Is not there an opportunity to occupy Sinai, preferably the Egyptians began to any hostile action can be thwarted, and thus the invasion of the desert. Weah disappointment when I told him that the Egyptians do not show any tendency towards facilitating the occupation ... ". A part of this important chapter talks about the search for any pretext of the Zionists, paves the way for the occupation of Sinai. As the command is not available, Diane suggested sending a ship flying the Israeli flag in the Straits of Eilat to lure the Egyptians for the hit and then complete the scenario.
In the meantime, is the massacre of Qibya that have claimed dozens of Palestinian civilians at the hands of the Zionists, who find themselves particularly Charette in trouble are justified and explained what happened in front of international public opinion the compressor. Massacre shows a lack of satisfaction Charette entirely for this work carried out by militant groups and supporting the current Ben-Gurion - Dayan, showing disregard for the horrors that took place ...
Chapter IV: a historic opportunity to occupy southern Syria
In one meeting which was held on January 31, 1954 Dayan proposed a plan of action to provoke the Syrians and to draw the Israelis to hit the fishermen in Lake Tiberias. If the command fails, work to take the Iraqi intervention in Syria troubled time as a pretext to interfere in Syria and the occupation of the south.
Both Ben Gurion and Dayan, Lafon supported the proposed plans, but strongly opposed by Charette. And agrees that the Senator following is looming on the horizon when battling each Shishakli Adib Hashim Atassi, and the conflict resolved in favor of the second. In this context, promoted by the Jewish state news reports that Iraqi forces had entered the line of conflict in Syria, which was denied by the press and the international media and confirmed by the facts, and this was a Tvueta for the opportunity to wait it out was hard-line trend and active in the Zionist entity.
Continued Israeli provocations, as a prelude to lure the Syrians but without avail.
On December 12, 1954, abduction of the Israeli Air Force plane Syrian civilian passengers and detained for 48 hours has formed the controversial article with Charette, who accused his opponents of wanting to impose the law of the jungle to international relations and bring the world to their will and interests. The pretext for the Israeli hijacking operation is its violation of Syrian sovereignty of Israel, which was denied by Charette.
The day before, and only one, gave the Syrians arrested an Israeli spy ring consisting of five people were put to wiretap the telephone networks of Syria. In prison, one of the oldest members of the cell to commit suicide, which exacerbated the debate between hard-line trend and Sharett, who was considered an important task of this cell outrageous.
Chapter V: Let's Nncye Maronite State in Lebanon
This chapter tells some of what took place in the meeting held on February 27, 1954 to include all of Ben-Gurion, Sharett, Lavon and Dayan on the Lebanese issue. Trend opposition to Charette suggested a project to establish a Maronite State in Lebanon by creating unrest among ethnic groups, and impossible to make efforts to secure funding from the Jewish Agency if it is not from the Ministry of Finance. Sharett opposed the project, but not on the noble but on the basis that it is not possible does not serve the goals of the State of "Israel".
Project Ben-Gurion and his followers included the following points: Lebanon is the weakest of the Arab League countries, are historically the majority of the Maronites in Lebanon, support for the Christian world, both Catholic and Protestant brethren in Lebanon. Means: the creation of a civil war, the infusion of funds where necessary, find a Maronite secure this project.
Charette opposed because: Maronites are not the majority, there is a Maronite, saying believing in this project, at least at the time, that the adoption of the project is on the money and not on faith (a Maronite secure the project) that carries the seeds of failure, said the declaration would lead to a Maronite the integration of Muslims with a very vast lands of Syria, and thus becomes the Maronite surrounded by an Islamic state is huge. There is no guarantee material and moral enough internationally and regionally.
As is known, the draft Ben-Gurion and his followers, which is destined to be achieved to some extent. On February 12, 1955 meeting between Eliyahu Sasson, the Israeli ambassador in Rome and Najib small, representing apparently Camille Chamoun, the conditions for implementation were discussed.
In practice, the project began after the war of the 67 upon the arrival of Diane to the Defense Ministry when he took the search for a Maronite officer is ready to proclaim a state-saving and on the pretext of Maronites (commando operations launched from Lebanon) ....
Chapter VI: Sacred Terror
Outline of this chapter is the relentless Israeli attempts to create the atmosphere and the ground to wage war on the Arab countries in the mid-fifties, which saw a rapprochement between Arab countries and the West generally. In preparation for this war, the work of the Israeli army and the Zionist gangs to commit numerous massacres and acts of violence in order to drag Arab states, which has worked to take all precautions and security measures to thwart attempts by the Jewish state, to reply, and counter-retaliation and up to the war.
In chapter details and backgrounds to commit two slaughters: The first: the attack on a bus on 17 March 1954 on the road between Eilat and Beer, where a young man claimed the lives of ten passengers from the Zionists. "Israel" accused the Bedouins of Jordan, which in turn denied this and accused the "Israel" Pavtaalha excuse. The final investigation and all parties failed to reach conclusive results, but they all pointed out that the likelihood is that which is carried out by Zionist elements but not Arab. The massacre showed how most of the Zionist officials except Charette tried to use as a pretext to launch large-scale attack on Jordan and the occupation of the West Bank. But the response of the Israelis reflect a fierce attack on the village "Nahalin" near Bethlehem, killing and wounding dozens of Palestinians and also the demolition of dozens of homes.
The second massacre committed in the month of March 1955 when they killed a group of Israeli reserve army, later identified as linked to Ariel Sharon, five Bedouin Jordanians. Group had been arrested by the Israeli army admitted doing so. But the scenario orchestrated by all military and political officials only Charette and his group for their release, which occurred after a brief period of arrest and confession. Chapter shows how most segments of Israeli society and Israeli public opinion has supported this group did not feel the absolute minimum of regret, which surprised Charette horror of what happened at the moral, emotional, legal and political ...
Chapter Seven: the Lavon Affair: Terrorism in order to force the West
"First: Start immediate action to prevent or postpone the objectives of the Agreement Anglo - Egyptian, which is to: a. - Cultural centers and media, b - economic institutions, c - Cars and other delegates from the British, d - the destruction of any target can lead to the abuse of diplomatic relations.
Second: Let us know on what can be done on the Canal Zone (Suez).
Third: Listen to us every day at the seventh long wave c ".
This is the content text of the message sent to an Israeli spy ring in Egypt planted several months before its implementation, which occurred between 2 and July 27, 1954, and this telegram summarizing the general thrust of this chapter.
Relations were on their way to development and improvement, between Egypt and Britain (for the evacuation of the Suez Canal) and the United States, which promised to provide military supplies. The aim is to strike at Israel this rapprochement between Egypt and the Arab world, was the terrorist operations carried out against the cultural centers and American media, and against the role of British cinema and buildings Egyptian official in Cairo and Alexandria.
This issue is known as the Lavon Affair, who was defense minister at the time. It shows only after seven years of investigations, Israeli is not the fault of Avon, but this plot sewn by groups of Ben-Gurion and Dayan, Peres and Javeley and a number of other senior security and military Zionists. Charette was surprised at what happened because he did not know about all this and even condemned it, but in secret and not in public because he feared public opposition in the event that the accused by hardliners as defeatist and not on the degree of responsibility and leadership history.
Chapter VIII: Nasser: Coexistence with Israel is possible
Ben-Gurion: the process of the Gaza Strip.
Gamal Abdel Nasser did not hostile to Israel that shows the image in the Arab media. By Nasser has more than once derailed Altswoi and compromise, such as the words for "Roger Baldwin" Envoy of U.S. human rights organization as "not of those who want to throw the" Israel "in the Mediterranean." He believes in coexistence with "Israel" and that negotiations will begin in one day.
After finding that the terrorist operations carried out in Cairo and Alexandria, Nasser did not alter the analysis by U.S. intelligence, its position on the possibility of agreements with the Government of Charette.
The United States has put double pressure on both Nasser and Sharett in order to start negotiations leading to the kind of agreements.
Charette Government for its part, was under growing pressure from hard-line trend, which was aimed to further tension and escalation to the point of making a massive retaliatory action in the Gaza Strip in response to alleged terrorist acts against the settlers here and there in occupied Palestine, which was often fabricated by Zionists with a view to a wider war first and with a view to strained relations between the Arabs and the West II.
Thus, it was Ben-Gurion's group carried out a military operation in the Gaza Strip, killing 39 and wounding 30 Egyptians. Charette and agreed to the operation, but if it does not have a broad meaning they do not lead to more than a dozen victims. Although this process, and during a conversation between chiefs of staff Egyptian and Israeli Almndoyen under the banner of the Mixed Armistice Commission, said the first second that Nasser had told him that he had personal contacts with Israeli Prime Minister, and there are several good things can tend in a positive direction ...
Chapter IX: dispersal of Palestinian refugees
One of the major factors to exacerbate the situation by "Israel" is the distance and the dispersion of the Palestinians who left the territory of the 48 areas where they sought refuge along the lines of the truce in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.
That their presence there is always that they left their homeland by force, which will lead to international pressure to eventually return to their homes. The aim was also expelled again from there and bring them into the Arab countries Alakharyz
In this particular case, the similarity of the position of Charette with the position of the current hard-line ...
Chapter X: overthrow Nasser
At that time, the work of mainstream Zionist hardline regime was ousted Nasser for two reasons: the first personal Nasser leadership gathered and brought most Arab states and part of third world countries under his command against "Israel" with the means of pressure on the various levels of political, economic, military and media ...
II: convergence between Nasser and the West in general, and between America and Britain in particular, which means the exception, "Israel" and to be away from the center of attention and support of the Western world.
To this end, the campaign launched a two-way, I took the external portrays Nasser as too weak to establish a relationship of alliance and cooperation stable and consistent with the West because the state is weak and powerless and suffer from so many problems ...
II Ext: Egypt portrayed as a powerful and great and it's the most important in the Arab world, so it is always an existential danger. It must be hit before it growing more Vistvhal ordered and become immune to deterrence ...
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق
أضف تعليق