Mobilized our forces and our goal is clear
And the enemy strength days, "a day after
We are at the peak after the gradient
There is D in the fates of men
Because of the flooding, which leads to win
When you ignore it, the journey of life
Would settle in shallow water and unhappiness
And in the midst of the sea Ntefo now
Either rush with the mainstream setting and losers either
These lines of poetry to Brutus cited Samuel Huntington to conclude by saying that the West should learn to sail in shallow water. And it is absurd to repeat the experience of Brutus, who fought the flood thumped defeat. So it would be pointless to continue the policy of containment in the West influence. This is contrary to the continuing logic of things and the natural progression as expand the nuclear club and owner of various weapons of mass destruction.
Turning to the Arab-Israeli conflict, we find that our nation have become addicted to sailing in shallow water. Shreds our fellow living with an average per capita income is low with the profound conviction to continue to claim their rights. And the willingness of other terrifying to die for these rights. But what about the other Israelis? What about the role of a career that embodies the U.S. test of strength is transferred to the laboratory for exams this force?. These questions present themselves strongly after hitting the conflict to profiling which reflects the prospects for the U.S. to act before the enemy alternative expected. Has become the global concept of the conflict of the military to economic and from there to the default. Where U.S. strategists speak today about the war or a war of default knowledge (Rosenfeldt and Arquilla). These changes force us to make adjustments in the ways of our engagement with the other actual (Israel) and symbolic (the United States and camp). This amendment should focus on themes articulated the following:
1. Skip ignore the principle of
We stayed for a long time and the circumstances of information depend policy to avoid going into the details with the rush to draw the final results in our conflict with Israel. This avoidance was required to ignore the capabilities of the Israeli media and diplomatic superiority in the adoption of back doors. But the information revolution now give our audience in a direct confrontation with the information that we deliberately ignored for decades. Should we allow our audience to receive this information from dubious sources and misleading? Or is it our duty that we can put on it and set it Bmtnolh according to objective historical contexts?. Will leave it to the back-door diplomacy that the transformation of random groups to the effectiveness and impact?. Support through the media, "and financially". To go beyond these groups genuinely expressive of national blocs from the public.
2. The prevention of flood information
Can be summed up strategy against the leakage of information with the era of communications based on the principle as a dumping Information. To being pumped into the information-intensive confusing to the recipient. A density that renders it incapable "to select the appropriate information and classified in the schedules of clear priorities. And prevention in this case lies in ensuring that protect our public authorities to engage in a maze of what is known as the other I know he knows him, etc. .... In the introduction to identify preventive steps to history Jewish. They know the pious audience suggestions of Jewish mythology. which has controlled for the world public opinion until the beginning of Mrajatha by Alarkyulugiyn and anthropologists and eyewitnesses, historians and other reviewers. here is a need to translate that as quickly as possible and the writings of objective review. with close attention to the writings of historians new Israeli. especially the "find them after the impact," in various stages of Jewish history. the longer the failed ideas of the Jewish movement to continue the review of the so-called parallel Palmwrgen new day. even Freud speaks in his writings about the movement of new Jewish historians dating back to the nineteenth century century. and lists some "of their names.
3. Resorting to Anthropology.
Henry Vosion that history is the deification of backwards. And the process of following this a must-have attention to the gaps Aldahdp for this below. So it's no longer enough "to say that Jews are Ashkenazi Khazar Jews are thus not Hebrews. But now we have to receive the support of the Jewish answer to the next. Namely, that the Khazar tribes were the ten lost Jewish tribes. In other words, we must realize that we are legends Ngara . and most important step in this dispute you is to force the Jews to return to the shelter to debunk myths, which they call objectivity. Therefore, anthropology is the ruling in this dispute you. It is no doubt strengthened with time, modern archaeological research. Perhaps these statements together and prospects for the future is called a group of Israelis to go back to trick the new date. Hence our reservation on these writings.
section1
Self Amololp
It was these three points are Our search for the formulation and defended the ideas of our book "self Amololp - the psychology of the Israeli policy." So that the transition from military conflict to economic include a call to the nations of the Club were excluded from the international military to engage in a new club (here mention the experience of the Asian Tigers, regardless of subsequent economic crisis which must be utilized). It is an opportunity to install our membership in this club. The features of the conflict had turned into default - my knowledge it opens doors for individuals (drain) to enter as members influential in the decision. With the necessary awareness of the need for rehabilitation of individuals and to renew contact with our immigrants and export of new and qualified personnel for the effect. Perhaps we need here a practical example of these shifts. Here, we resort to the example of the young Filipino inventor virus "I love you" that was able to inflict losses threatened Bmsttmri information. And the damage caused by the virus to weaken the financial and moral support so-called American "terrorism violent. This example shows that the impossibility of containing the influence (ownership of the destructive power) has become a reality."
Go back to the Jewish self-defense to say that the communications revolution are put in front of our fans and therefore the Israeli intelligence connection to the remote or through a medium or rarely "direct" with the Israelis. This requires strengthening of preventive Information for this public, including avoiding a sense of shock that he was deceived. "Sure it's a shock to happen if we left our audience drawing on information from Israeli sources readings of the facts. Especially the" fringe groups when adopting these readings Balliberalip covert diplomacy and rear doors. This is equivalent to the production of our own reading of these facts. The equivalent of more or less re-write our history, the Arabs since the beginning of the twentieth century until today. And here will be difficult to overcome, but can not drop some of the constants of the system prevailing in the relational communication between the Arab world. As the retention of these constants will plunge the audience in a sea of confusing information that will confuse unable to make it "as the selection of current and future stakeholders in the future. Without means to ignore this information. It means shortened with the position in the frame. Alrahnip and out of confusing. It is obsolete constants are:
1. Treason: that is no longer a place after Tomrk the world and is under the sovereignty of the American decision.
This is a reality we have to deal with the necessary objectivity. It puts America's Arab friends in front of the responsibility to protect other Arab countries in the face of incitement against Israel. While working to find ways to establish a formula valid for the interests of Arab involvement in the game of global interests. To be a prelude to the face of Israeli functional role in this game.
2. Establishing the concept of the other Arab: where we see multiple directions call for openness to Israel and ignore the other accepting the opinion of the other Arab. So that some of these groups are divided on political trends in Israel with the declared open hostility to the Arabs of others. And sometimes "to their fellow citizens. Does that mean the acceptance of others to reject ourselves?.
3. Arab differences in chronic conditions: at the top of border disputes that are almost permeated among the Arab countries as between them and the neighbors. These differences are a direct threat and the closest to the Arab national security. Which renders the solution of border disputes between the Arabs condition "essential" for that security. Differences that are no longer viable solution "for the delay. If we want to avoid Asnhaddamha as explosive future of conflict between the Arab world., Followed by the need for less importance is the need to resolve border disputes and water with neighboring States. According to" reject the accusations of treason, some Arabs want to solve these problems so with Israel. We Ankhunhm but only asking them not to ignore other views. Both within their own countries or in other Arab countries.
4. Confronting Israeli myths: The transformation of the global concept of the conflict we must be prepared to confront Israel on the level of civilization. So as to avoid battle with them to conflict with the founding myths as a nation. Which requires us to full membership in the archaeological and anthropological research and place them "in the media of the new world which Israel no longer able to generate the containment and its codification.
Out "of these data was our contribution to the book self-Amololp step towards the definition of Arab readers to harness the techniques of cultural anthropology to expose the Israeli allegations that have accumulated since the Zionist movement. As well as the reserve of attempts to break the Israeli-dumping and that trusteth. Where we thought that the compulsive repetition of the tricks the old Jewish sponsor exposing all Israeli attempts. It attempts to make peace is more dangerous and aggressive. If what we have to respect the other hand, Arab opinion written aware readers belong to a class that oppose compromise with Israel. at least to it incapable of the slightest recognition of the other. But we agree with Edward Said's view: "The equality and either does not. "noting that the supposed Ptjbna Said Israel's ability to respond to its principle of equality.
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق
أضف تعليق