From Iraq, to Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and even, what is lacking is the vision. The crisis may not be solvable for one reason at least: a lack of understanding that is not in these countries think of how to address the disaster name of the educational system.
From Tunisia, to Egypt, to Libya, to Yemen, and Iraq before that. One question: Why all this failure that accompanies the post to get rid of dictatorships?
The answer is, that if we exclude Yemen, which is a special case back to the nature of the system that was in place, as well as the nature of the country itself, we find that the basic problem is the same in all countries that have experienced revolutions.
The problem is that there are those who try to repeat the experience of the former regime and various gown, ignoring the problem of education. Education on the basis of everything. NH in a building based on different communities fighting extremism and subversive ideas, communities are able to take advantage of the technological revolution taking place in the world instead of staying on the sidelines.
There is no doubt that the legacy of all the countries mentioned is great, especially that attempts took place in all of Libya, Egypt and Iraq in order to change the nature of society and lifestyle in big cities.
This does not mean that the possible omission of the responsibility borne by the new regulations, which took over power, or operate to grab it.
In Egypt, for example, did not make the Muslim Brotherhood who have sought and continue to seek to monopolize power little to no effort in order to understand that it is not possible to develop Egypt without an economic plan and clear and without political openness on both the political elites and without a constitution Advanced actually ... and without programs educational relationship era.
Shows clearly that there is no such thing as a political and economic project with the Muslim Brotherhood, in the absence of even the idea of you to take advantage of the capabilities possessed by Egypt.
Does not exist even for an idea of the real problems afflicting Egypt starting population growth Crazy, down to the tourism declining and security lost, through the absence full of educational programs developed linking Egyptian youth civilized world and make Egypt a state able to provide job opportunities for college graduates in them.
After more than two years from the age of the Egyptian revolution, not having any hope of any kind was a better future for the biggest Arab country. There is a flood disaster threatens the future of Egypt, where security is missing. What applies to Egypt, applies to Libya and Tunisia. In Egypt, he can build on what was left of the state institutions instead of working to penetrate the Brotherhood and converted into a branch of the organization of the ruling party.
In Libya, did not inherit the new system, if this is possible to talk about a new system, any institutions. Muammar Gaddafi spent on everything. Spent on state institutions and the social fabric of the country and on education and culture. Spent on the economy, politics, and held a "mass" is a country turned into a large shop run by a moron is that it is his duty to destroy Libya to the Libyan capital and reprisals against them on a daily basis.
What does Gaddafi who succeeded is to implement his will, undeclared, no more no less dependent on religious slogans brought by the Muslim Brotherhood and the like in most cases. There is a section of the Libyan people still resist the dark thoughts based on what he inherited from the values were prevalent during the monarchy. But it seems that the destructive ideology of the late leader is the strongest. Proof of this is what we are currently witnessing the siege of state institutions implemented by the militia was supposed to be in command of the government ... If in command of the chaos and the dark thoughts and logos buzz.
Tunisia does not seem to be too far from the chaos, although it was the right place to set up a different state in every sense of the word. What can not be ignored that Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to leave the institutions of a modern state.
It is true that former Tunisian President bred in the area of the family in order to tamper with the country, in addition to that he spent on political life entirely in it after he acted as a police officer in one of the neighborhoods of the capital and not as head of state. However, it is also true that the Tunisian experience has been successful to a large extent in the field of economic and social given that it has strengthened the middle class on the one hand and dedicated women's rights on the other.
Therefore, the failure of the Muslim Brotherhood in Tunisia after doubly worked to destroy everything that is successful in the modern state belong to all that is civilized in this world, a state founded by Habib Bourguiba. Bourguiba was an exceptional man that came to the day that he became a prisoner of the authority that decided to stick it out in spite of his advanced age.
From Iraq, to Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and even, what is lacking is the vision. There is no vision of what could be the state finally got rid of a dictatorial regime.
If these countries shorten the crisis may not be solvable for one reason at least. The reason for this lack of understanding that is not in these countries think of how to address the disaster name of the educational system.
Enough to reflect on what happened to him the level of education in Iraq, where control of religious parties, to make sure that the situation experienced by these countries today is much better than that Staish tomorrow or the day after tomorrow
From Tunisia, to Egypt, to Libya, to Yemen, and Iraq before that. One question: Why all this failure that accompanies the post to get rid of dictatorships?
The answer is, that if we exclude Yemen, which is a special case back to the nature of the system that was in place, as well as the nature of the country itself, we find that the basic problem is the same in all countries that have experienced revolutions.
The problem is that there are those who try to repeat the experience of the former regime and various gown, ignoring the problem of education. Education on the basis of everything. NH in a building based on different communities fighting extremism and subversive ideas, communities are able to take advantage of the technological revolution taking place in the world instead of staying on the sidelines.
There is no doubt that the legacy of all the countries mentioned is great, especially that attempts took place in all of Libya, Egypt and Iraq in order to change the nature of society and lifestyle in big cities.
This does not mean that the possible omission of the responsibility borne by the new regulations, which took over power, or operate to grab it.
In Egypt, for example, did not make the Muslim Brotherhood who have sought and continue to seek to monopolize power little to no effort in order to understand that it is not possible to develop Egypt without an economic plan and clear and without political openness on both the political elites and without a constitution Advanced actually ... and without programs educational relationship era.
Shows clearly that there is no such thing as a political and economic project with the Muslim Brotherhood, in the absence of even the idea of you to take advantage of the capabilities possessed by Egypt.
Does not exist even for an idea of the real problems afflicting Egypt starting population growth Crazy, down to the tourism declining and security lost, through the absence full of educational programs developed linking Egyptian youth civilized world and make Egypt a state able to provide job opportunities for college graduates in them.
After more than two years from the age of the Egyptian revolution, not having any hope of any kind was a better future for the biggest Arab country. There is a flood disaster threatens the future of Egypt, where security is missing. What applies to Egypt, applies to Libya and Tunisia. In Egypt, he can build on what was left of the state institutions instead of working to penetrate the Brotherhood and converted into a branch of the organization of the ruling party.
In Libya, did not inherit the new system, if this is possible to talk about a new system, any institutions. Muammar Gaddafi spent on everything. Spent on state institutions and the social fabric of the country and on education and culture. Spent on the economy, politics, and held a "mass" is a country turned into a large shop run by a moron is that it is his duty to destroy Libya to the Libyan capital and reprisals against them on a daily basis.
What does Gaddafi who succeeded is to implement his will, undeclared, no more no less dependent on religious slogans brought by the Muslim Brotherhood and the like in most cases. There is a section of the Libyan people still resist the dark thoughts based on what he inherited from the values were prevalent during the monarchy. But it seems that the destructive ideology of the late leader is the strongest. Proof of this is what we are currently witnessing the siege of state institutions implemented by the militia was supposed to be in command of the government ... If in command of the chaos and the dark thoughts and logos buzz.
Tunisia does not seem to be too far from the chaos, although it was the right place to set up a different state in every sense of the word. What can not be ignored that Zine El Abidine Ben Ali to leave the institutions of a modern state.
It is true that former Tunisian President bred in the area of the family in order to tamper with the country, in addition to that he spent on political life entirely in it after he acted as a police officer in one of the neighborhoods of the capital and not as head of state. However, it is also true that the Tunisian experience has been successful to a large extent in the field of economic and social given that it has strengthened the middle class on the one hand and dedicated women's rights on the other.
Therefore, the failure of the Muslim Brotherhood in Tunisia after doubly worked to destroy everything that is successful in the modern state belong to all that is civilized in this world, a state founded by Habib Bourguiba. Bourguiba was an exceptional man that came to the day that he became a prisoner of the authority that decided to stick it out in spite of his advanced age.
From Iraq, to Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, Yemen and even, what is lacking is the vision. There is no vision of what could be the state finally got rid of a dictatorial regime.
If these countries shorten the crisis may not be solvable for one reason at least. The reason for this lack of understanding that is not in these countries think of how to address the disaster name of the educational system.
Enough to reflect on what happened to him the level of education in Iraq, where control of religious parties, to make sure that the situation experienced by these countries today is much better than that Staish tomorrow or the day after tomorrow
0 التعليقات:
إرسال تعليق
أضف تعليق