Wonder about the intellectual context for the Prosecution of Garaudy, and whether they would simply review the game in question their ability to influence Alantelijncia French. And find the answer that this trial is based on a coherent theoretical basis. In France there is a law called the law "Fabius - Gesu" exceptional in the world of 1990 and is required to punish those who deny the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews (in the gas chambers) - according to a decision of the Nuremberg Tribunal of war criminals - imprisonment for one year plus fine of three hundred thousand francs . Thus, the French law, punishable by atheism, or to deny the existence of Christ, but is punishable by denial of the Holocaust, and is therefore implicitly recognizes the fact that the Jews God's chosen people.
Garaudy's book of the "founding myths of Israeli politics," a solid theoretical base and coherent to stand trial. It is true that French intellectuals described this law was "scandalous", but this description did not prevent the continuation of this law.
Before turning to this trial, we find it necessary to elaborate and clarify some points and start with:
1 - About the book: "founding myths of Israeli politics," a book by a prominent thinker Garaudy did not find publishers adopted because of the danger. And as evidence of premeditation and baptism by the author published at his own expense in early 1996, and during one month, the book has been translated into twenty languages. In this proof of the capacity to spread and severity, which manifested itself Ptsidi Garaudy for the implementation of religious myths and Israeli politics.
A - religious myths: dealt Garaudy myth of Palestine - the Promised Land and saw it land usurped and stolen. The myth of God's chosen people saw it as a way of arrogance on the other and shed destroyed. And either of the ethnic cleansing has been practiced by Israel since the massacre of Deir Yassin.
Garaudy and opinions in this chapter, brought him the following charges:
1 - read the Bible differently, to read the Jews.
2 - Racial Discrimination and accusing the other of ethnic cleansing.
3 - to question the term "God's chosen people" and the term "Promised Land".
4 - attacks on the Jewish self and its past.
5 - the tone of provocation.
B - the political myths: and a refusal to direct the first of these myths and the fact that the Zionist anti-fascist and revoked by the facts of the Jews deal with the Nazis, and including Yitzhak Shamir, who was arrested in Damascus in 1941 in the Office of the Secret Nazi who was dealing with him. The second deals with the veto halo surrounding the fairness of the Nuremberg trials. As the Second World War devoured 60 million casualties, including 20 million Soviet, and it is true then based on these trials (Nuremberg) to the principle that it was intended to annihilate the Jews as Jews? Garaudy also felt the absence of any document calling for the extermination of the Jews (issued by Hitler or other), as well as the absence of any person who bears witness to the alleged gas chambers. Garaudy, and also questioned the numbers of Jewish victims, sees it ranged between three million and 950 thousand. In this difference is cause for reflection.
T - from the myths and political revoked the book saying: "A land without people for a people without land" as the numbers and proved that the Jews owned 3.5% of the land when the Balfour Declaration, and 6.5% at the issuance of the partition resolution, then they have the 93 % of the land in 1983, and it refers to the sacking of "Israel Shahal" in 1975, when it published a list of 385 Palestinian villages were removed by bulldozers, out of 475 villages were registered in 1948, and in this physical evidence on the issue of ethnic cleansing.
As for the charges brought in this veto to Garaudy are the following:
1 - cast doubt on Hitler's genocide of six million Jews.
2 - to question the crimes against the Jews in the Holocaust (gas chamber).
3 - use the term "Final Solution of the Jewish question."
4 - to question the decisions of the Nuremberg Tribunal.
5 - criticism of Zionism and Israeli politics.
6 - to provoke the Jewish lobby, France.
7 - accuse the Zionist collaboration with the Nazis.
8 - to condemn the law Fabius - Gesu.
With this, the book has brought to the channel three ten counts, each of which constitutes a starting point for trial.
2 - reactions of liberal book:
That freedom of opinion is sacred in France, and as noted above, it can reach the limits of atheism. But a book like this, he must to raise some of the reactions of liberal civilized, and which do not affect the application of the law Fabius - Gesu, including:
1 - received death threats, consisting of nine.
2 - press had a violent campaign of defamation against the author refuses to give him the right of reply.
3 - have been physically attacked on the distributor and the book has been disfigured his face.
4 - burned libraries and interfaces that display author wrote.
5 - prevent the emergence of copyright in the media to deny the right to express an opinion.
And these practices are not isolated or an emergency it may precedents such as:
1 - Garaudy presented himself for trial 3 times because of an article published in the newspaper "Omend", condemning the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982.
2 - for questioning the existence of gas chambers, separated from his Ruperforeson Professor at the University of Lyon, and so his life has been scientifically and morally.
3 - Henry Roque researcher obtained a doctorate degree from the University of "Nantes", under the supervision of a professor at the University itself. And was the subject of the message the gas chambers. And to show that a researcher doubts existence result was already withdrawn from the PhD (for the first time in the history of French universities) as well as to separate the decision of the supervisor, a professor of French Education Minister.
- Garaudy thinker:
Garaudy transferred by virtue of its environment and its composition between atheism and communism, Christianity and Islam. And was not radical in any of these attitudes and intellectual affiliations. It may have been sufficient flexibility that enabled him to achieve such variations property. He criticized the tendency when fanatical Islamic extremists in his book: "Islam's greatness and decadence." There are also critical of this tendency among Christians, in his book "Towards a war between religions", where the bombing took a risk and the contradiction between the Christian and Christian Paul Issa. And with the ideas that were discussed by the stakeholders of all the calm and respect for the opinion. When he reached his criticism of Jewish extremism was the above-mentioned aspects liberal!! Whatever the case, wrote this thinker and his biography Tbanan opposition to extremism and persistent quest for difference and respect the right of privacy, and Ncute in identifying points of convergence and totalitarian elements in support of the possibility of "dialogue of civilizations."
Sheikh said this 84 years old fully aware of the legend control deal with the present, and the effect of both on policy. Gho aware of that possibility of the clash of legends which sought to limit their effects. As the revolution of information and communication technologies and the next century, all of which affect the credibility of the legend. If we want to "dialogue of civilizations", which avoids the "clash of civilizations", we review the legends. Perhaps the easiest Houmradjap modern ones. Because the worse the myth has the sanctity of review makes it more difficult to turn into something like faith or heritage. And thinker, this crisis was that he dared to review the myths of "God's chosen people" and that the task was voluntary and perhaps it was the duty of the Jews themselves to do. And for a number of reasons, including:
1 - What Garaudy said at the end of the book (and is what the Jews knew in their bones) of the existence of tons of German documents and archives that were transferred to the United States. There are also other archives in Russia, and possibly in other countries. And these documents will be sooner or later, subjects and inventory control and re-read to make the views of Muslim inter Garaudy intuitive.
2 - What is known about the secrecy and mystery surrounding the Dead Sea manuscripts, which Israel refuses to inform them of student and interested in, and shy away from recognition of its contents, it threatens the legends of the Jewish Theological Seminary.
3 - Agreement on the principle of non-coincidental to say the possibility of recurring phenomena extensively. When Ttaker phenomenon of what we can not arrived uninvited to the accident.
And from here we can not respond to the phenomenon of Jews were encountered in different time periods of captivity and oppression ... Etc.. This phenomenon back in the opinion of the author to the founding myths of Israeli policy.
3 - Garaudy trial:
Mentioned above thirteen charge Garaudy trial on this basis. But the main charge which is to deny the gas chambers (the Holocaust). And is suing the author of this action are: 1 - anti-racist movement for Friendship among Peoples (MRAP) and 2 - International Committee against Racism and Anti-Semitism (LICRA) and 3 - "Lawyers without Borders."
And the Jewish lobby (represented Balbaron Rothschild) was governor because of his article in Garaudy "to Omend" and that condemning Israel's invasion of Lebanon, and for involvement in the massacres of Sabra and Shatila. Garaudy day and won his innocence from the court to have a condemnation of the Jewish lobby, and attempts to liquidate an intellectual thinker, once it reached the inability to find a publisher for his book profit and secured success, and the intellectual level and political. Noting that this did not prevent the book's publication and did not prevent translated into twenty languages and did not invalidate a month of its issuance.
The trial Tojat myths about the book, and await the verdict in the case on February 27 (February) being transferred to us remember what the American Jewish Chomsky, Alan French and Ubion, for considering the unequal between the powerful and the weak. And wonder whether this consideration will not equal in their houses powerful?.
Sweеt blοg! Ι fοund it ωhilе suгfing аrоund on Yahoο Nеwѕ.
ردحذفDo yοu haνe anу tіps οn how to get listeԁ in Yahоo Neωs?
I've been trying for a while but I never seem to get there! Thanks
Here is my weblog :: san fran City tours